To support your false claims about your hero, you included a carefully excerpted clip from transcripts that in reality, in context, was praise for Romney and weak praise, at that -- we're NOT talking the "Religion in America" speech, which was not about Romney's politics, but about what its title suggests; lurkeres and readers, please UNDERSTAND that when a pundint even weakly praises Romney about something, this guy and others will boldlly and authoritatively decoare that such pundit "endorsed" Romney when the pundit did no such thing. Rameumptom has proven to me that his standards for ethics and honesty are pretty low. This post is FYI.
Other Romney fans here have claimed falsely that Michael Reagan "endorsed" Romney, and by "endorse" or "support," I maintain that in the political context, those words specifically imply that the person or organization doing them is advocating financial support or advising that people vote for the specific candidate. Now, sadly, Mark Levin did just that becasue he believed Romney was the least of the evils in front of primary voters, so it's truthful to say Levin "endorsed" Romney. But it is plainly false to say Limbaught did, and so far it looks like its false to say Reagan did, took because the only printed written words from Reagan himself that you use to support your claim, were from a column written almost two years ago about how Romney and Giuliani were both more conservative that people give them credit for -- the column you cite as evidence of Reagan "supporting" Romney was actually about how Republicans should accept liberal tendencies in their candidates, that there are no "perfect" conservative candidates.
It irks the heck out of me, Rameumpton, that you keep posting crap to force Romney down the throats of Republicans when you have exhibited on this forum lack of ethics and dare I say it, a propensity to LIE OUTRIGHT in order to convince readers that brilliant minds agree with you about your hero. They don't, and as far as I am concerned, YOU HAVE ZERO CREDIBILITY.
I apologize for all the horrible typos in my post above — posted it before I had a chance to proof and fix it! My point remains the same, however: Rameumpton and like-minded Romney supporters deserve little credibility based on their past false claims that their hero is supported by certain pundits.