Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sharrukin

I think we agree that there is reason for suspicion. I do wish O will be legally compelled to release the vault certificate, though voluntarily would be better.

Bringing in argument like the Sun stuff just weakens the argument and distracts from real issues. During Sun’s time, the US enforced the Chinese Exclusion Act and so his supporters in China forged birth records to get him into the US. Further, 1904 is not the 1960’s and certainly not modern times. I am not ruling out foul play, but record keeping in territorial Hawaii was not up to modern standards.


989 posted on 12/09/2008 5:41:01 AM PST by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 893 | View Replies ]


To: pa mom

If you had checked the link you would have found that others have done the same thing. That is the law prevailing at the time in question and it continued until 1972, so I am not really sure what your point is.

Foreign born individuals were granted documents that are used as ‘birth certificates’ in Hawaii. How that isn’t relevant is beyond me. We are considering the possibility of a foreign born individual (Obama) having a Hawaiian ‘birth certificate’ are we not?

Hawaii became a state in 1959 and Obama was born in 1961 shortly after statehood. Modern standards were not in use at the time. The standards of the late 1950’s would have been in use.


1,010 posted on 12/09/2008 2:49:11 PM PST by Sharrukin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson