Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: luvadavi
Right! Here we are arguing the BC, when Donofrio’s case was re the NJ Sec/State sidestepping the laws! If this was clear-cut why did the Court deny it?

I have a theory: The NJ law may not actually stipulate the extent to which the SOS there must verify the qualifications. It could very well be written in such a way as to permit the very practice that most of the states -- if not all -- are using: trusting the political parties to have vetted their candidates.

940 posted on 12/08/2008 7:51:35 PM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies ]


To: Technical Editor

That’s logical. And since this problem never arose before, it wasn’t anticipated. Those who were close to 0 helped conceal info also.


943 posted on 12/08/2008 8:02:18 PM PST by luvadavi (Important old novel: The Moon Is Down, John Steinbeck, 1942)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]

To: Technical Editor
I see a potential problem for relying on the SOS of each of 50 states to determine eligibility. Financial as well as logistical. Therefore IMO, Berg case seems to be stronger. That the burden/fraud belongs to Obama, the DNC, and the FEC. They should be held liable. The SOS just receives the message, THEY produce it.....

OTOH all SOS should verify what they are given, to illuminate fraud.

955 posted on 12/08/2008 8:15:48 PM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 940 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson