Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Canedawg; EternalVigilance

Leo just updated his blog. According to him his case is denied and not pending (at least that’s what I made of it), but Cort’s has not been acted upon. I agree that the Keyes case has the best chance.

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

EternalVigilance can you give us any updates on the Keyes case?


302 posted on 12/08/2008 9:01:02 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: atlbelle44
DONOFRIO APPLICATION DENIED - WROTNOWSKI APPLICATION STILL PENDING

My application was denied. The Honorable Court chose not to state why.

Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday. I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.

After six days, it’s interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.

My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a “motion for leave to appeal” rather than the “direct appeal” that it actually was. On Dec 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Dec. 22. The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.

On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Cort’s case, I must stress that Cort’s case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does. It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.

I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.

I don’t know if it’s significant that Cort’s case was not denied at the same time as mine. His case argues the same exact theory - that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.

All eyes should now be closely watching US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.

If Cort’s application is also denied then the fat lady can sing. Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case. Cort’s application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Cort’s quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.

I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.

Cort’s case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.

I’m not trying to play with people’s minds here. SCOTUS has not updated Cort’s docket and until they do there can be no closure. I was expecting, if they didn’t grant certiorarir, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue.

CLICK HERE

306 posted on 12/08/2008 9:02:23 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

To: atlbelle44

The CA Secretary of State, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and virtually all of the Obama electors have been served. A hearing is expected soon.


312 posted on 12/08/2008 9:03:05 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Hey Horowitz! Just because we don't swing left doesn't mean we're "unhinged".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

To: atlbelle44

Sorry to say, his explanation for the denial is somewhat delusional.

And let me add that one of the main reasons I do not think his case was the best one for the Court to consider is that the issues were blurred by his allegations that not one, but THREE candidates were ineligible.

If the Court is going to ever confront this controversy, it undoubtedly will choose to do it on a case that properly crystalizes the issues. This one wasnt that case.


331 posted on 12/08/2008 9:09:04 AM PST by Canedawg ("The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson