They simply weren't going to tolerate Clinton being removed for "sex" (and yes, we know it was about obstruction of justice). For the most part, elections are viewed as even more sacrosanct than the constitution, for in the minds of most people, elections ARE the embodiment of the constitution---the "will of the people." It's very, very dangerous to even try to overturn an election once it's taken place. The only time that has ever happened was when Nixon all but gave the noose to his attackers AND had a bad economy to boot.
The MSM didn't give them ( the sheeple public..) the info....and neither did our "Representatives" give the info.
There's a reason we call the general public the "Sheeple"...they are easily lead..if given true OR false info. IF...they had been told the truth about Clinton..the majority would have demanded he be removed. And algore would have taken over. Maybe you think that would have been dangerous....Ha!!
I dunno...but I laughed at your dangerous comment anyway...So do we just ignore any wrong acts by any that are elected?? Because darn we just don't want to "overturn" an election and admit we the voters were wrong or more likely duped. Give me a break, man! You are sounding like a MSM common-tator
FWIW-