Posted on 12/06/2008 10:40:20 PM PST by STARWISE
Thanks be to the Coulter.
Thanks STARWISE
Ping
Thanks STARWISE
Ping
Thanks, LucyT
Seems to me O is treating his BC and Citizenship as frivolous and not worth his time to tell us the truth.
This is O’s plan to create chaos and wear us down.
Surely the SCOTUS sees through this charade; O is treating this like a game while we have active forces out there DYING to protect our freedoms.
He’s not a Senator right now, and not legally a President-Elect. Why are we allowing him to act like this?
I need a good laugh in the midst of all his lies! Are there any animal photos to help PING this thread?
I know how it works, my mother started with three and ended up with two hundred...
Fred Nerks...
LOL! Great Kitty Starter Photo Kit PING.
Thanks so much for the photo. They are adorable.
I will add it to my collection.
Iowan, how ‘bout this to cheer you up?
Three men died on Christmas Eve and were met by Saint Peter at the pearly gates.
In honor of this holy season Saint Peter said, You must each possess something that symbolizes Christmas to get into heaven.
The first man fumbled through his pockets and pulled out a lighter. He flicked it on. It represents a candle, he said.
You may pass through the pearly gates Saint Peter said.
The second man reached into his pocket and pulled out a set of keys. He shook them and said, Theyre bells.
Saint Peter said You may pass through the pearly gates.
The third man started searching desperately through his pockets and finally pulled out a pair of womens panties.
St. Peter looked at the man with a raised eyebrow and asked, And just what do those symbolize?
The man replied, These are Carols.
Ahhhh...LucyT
Verrrrrrrry Funnny!
LOL!
Ping.
FROM Leo http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
DONOFRIO APPLICATION DENIED - WROTNOWSKI APPLICATION STILL PENDING
Posted in Uncategorized on December 8, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
My application was denied. The Honorable Court chose not to state why.
Wrotnowksi v. Connecticut Secretary of State is still pending as an emergency application resubmitted to the Honorable Associate Justice Antonin Scalia as of last Tuesday. I worked extensively on that application and it includes a more solid brief and a less treacherous lower Court procedural history.
After six days, its interesting that Scalia neither denied it nor referred it to the full Court.
My case may have suffered from the NJ Appellate Division Judge having incorrectly characterized my original suit as a motion for leave to appeal rather than the direct appeal that it actually was. On Dec 21 I filed official Judicial misconduct charges with the NJ Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, and I updated SCOTUS about that by a letter which is part of SCOTUS Docket as of Dec. 22. The NJ Appellate Divison official case file is fraudulent.
On the chance that SCOTUS was looking at both my case and Corts case, I must stress that Corts case does not have the same procedural hang up that mine does. It may be that without a decision on the Judicial misconduct allegation correcting the NJ Appellate Division case file, SCOTUS might have been in the position of not being able to hear my case as it would appear that my case was not before them on the proper procedural grounds.
I did file a direct appeal under the proper NJ Court rules, but the lower Court judge refused to acknowledge that and if his fraudulent docketing was used by SCOTUS they would have a solid procedural basis to throw mine out.
I dont know if its significant that Corts case was not denied at the same time as mine. His case argues the same exact theory - that Obama is not a natural born citizen because he was a British citizen at birth.
All eyes should now be closely watching US Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469, Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz.
If Corts application is also denied then the fat lady can sing. Until then, the same exact issue is before SCOTUS as was in my case. Corts application before SCOTUS incorporates all of the arguments and law in mine, but we improved on the arguments in Corts quite a bit as we had more time to prepare it.
I was in a rush to get mine to SCOTUS before election day, which I did do on Nov. 3.
Corts case has a much cleaner lower court procedural history.
Im not trying to play with peoples minds here. SCOTUS has not updated Corts docket and until they do there can be no closure. I was expecting, if they didnt grant certiorari, that they would deny both cases at the same time so as to provide closure to the underlying issue. I hate to read tea leaves, but Corts application is still pending. Thats all we can really say with any certainty.
Many thanks for the update, seekthetruth
The SCOTUS updated their docket quickly to show that Cort’s case is still proceeding. I am sure the MSM is having a fit and Barry’s tic is worse!!
We have to believe that truth and justice will prevail.
Save the Constitution Ping.
Below is update from Leos web site. Leo and Cort are going to be on Plains this evening beginning at 8:00. The Freeper Joe Thunder will be on Lan Lamphere at 10:30.
WROTNOWSKI APPLICATION REFERRED TO FULL COURT BY JUSTICE SCALIA - DISTRIBUTED FOR CONFERENCE ON DEC 12 - SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF TO BE SUBMITTED TOMORROW
Posted in Uncategorized on December 8, 2008 by naturalborncitizen
PRESS RELEASE: 12.08.08 7:20 pm
Cort Wrotnowskis emergency application for a stay and/or injunction as to the Electoral College meeting on Dec. 15 was today referred to the full Court by the Honorable Associate Justice Anotonin Scalia. It has been distributed for Conference of Friday December 12. The official case name is WROTNOWSKI v. BYSIEWICZ, United States Supreme Court Docket No. 08A469.
The Wrotnowski Supreme Court application was prepared by Leo Donofrio, Esq. and is centered on the same issue from Donofrios case which was discussed by the Supreme Court in its conference of December 5 - whether Barack Obama is not eligible to the office of President due to the fact that he was a British citizen at the time of his birth.
Tomorrow, Dec. 9 - Cort Wrotnowski will submit a supplemental brief concerning the newly discovered ineligibility of twenty-first President Chester Arthur due to his having been born as a British subject. This is relevant to the case at hand in that Justice Gray - who wrote the seminal opinion in United States v. Wong Kim Arc - was appointed by Chester Arthur.
The Wong Kim Arc case involves an important historical opinion that SCOTUS justices will certainly consider as to the Obama natural born citizen issue.
The recent discovery calls into question the motivations of both Arthur and Gray since Arthurs father was a British subject not naturalized at the time of Chesters birth. In fact, William Arthur was not naturalized until 1843, fourteen years after Chester was born. In the light of historical retrospection, Justice Grays decision in Wong Kim Arc seems tailor made to the circumstances of Arthurs birth.
Chester Arthur was born in 1829. The 14th Amendment wasnt ratified until 1868, and Wong Kim Arc was decided in 1898. But under United States law in 1829 its not clear that Arthur would have even been considered a United States citizen at the time of his birth, let alone a natural born citizen eligible to be President. At best, he would have been a dual citizen of Great Britain and the United States.
It was proved earlier this week, by various articles in the Brooklyn Eagle printed circa 1880, and other authorities, that when Arthur was on the campaign trail as Garfields running mate he lied many times about his fathers emigration record, his parents life in Canada before coming to the United States, and his fathers age. Chester also burned his papers and falsified his birth year. It appears now that he was doing so to conceal the POTUS eligibility issue.
Every other President (who didnt become eligible under the Article 2, Section 1 grandfather clause) was born to American citizen parents in the United States. The fact that he was a British subject at birth was first reported on Friday Dec. 5.
It must now be questioned whether the relationship between Chester Arthur and Justice Gray was influenced by Arthurs eligibility problems and whether those issues effected Grays opinion and vote in Wong Kim Arc.
It must also be considered that the integrity of Justice Grays SCOTUS appointment might have been called into question if Chester Arthurs POTUS ineligibility issues had become known.
All of the above is relevant to the issue of whether Barack Obama is a natural born citizen in that the core Supreme Court opinion in Wong Kim Arc must now be re-evaluated in lieu of the fact that the Justice who wrote the opinion was appointed by Chester Arthur.
Leo Donofrio will accompany Cort Wrotnowski to Washington D.C. tomorrow and both will be available for comment at 11:00 AM on the steps of the Supreme Court. This is not a rally, protest or vigil. If the media would like to discuss this historical brief and the issues discussed above, Donofrio and Wrotnowski will be available to answer any questions thereto.
Leo C. Donofrio, Esq.
Cort Wrotnowski
Thanks for the update, seekthetruth.
I can’t get the Plains info on my Apple.
So, I will follow the thread for tonight’s progam news.
Ping
FREEPERS: Listen on Plains Radio Network now at:
http://www.plainsradio.com/
Bookmark Leo Donofrios web site below and read all his information. Please check back for updates often. Leo is working with Cort on his case in Conference for Friday.Justice Scalia referred Corts case for Friday 12/12 Conference which is EARLIER than it would have normally gone to Conference. Might be a good sign.:)
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/
This is not over yet. Visit Freeper Joe Thunders web site and read about the Press Conference that he has on tape and will post tomorrow. The room was FULL of MSM but you wont see it on TV!
http://freedommarch.org/Home_Page.html
Thank you for the update.
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.