Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: driftdiver
"The success of the surge had more to do with tactics than the 20,000 extra troops they put in."

BS. If that were true Rumsfeld would still be SecDef. The tactics that were employed would not have been successful without the additional troops. Why would the Army increase troop strength/presence in country if they were not needed? Your theory lacks logic.

41 posted on 12/06/2008 5:12:40 PM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: blaquebyrd

“The tactics that were employed would not have been successful without the additional troops. Why would the Army increase troop strength/presence in country if they were not needed? Your theory lacks logic.”

They wouldn’t have needed the extra troops if the tactics were used. They had to add them by the time the surge took place to regain control.


45 posted on 12/06/2008 5:31:19 PM PST by driftdiver (No More Obama! - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: blaquebyrd

Drift diver is right. I was there during the surge, the combination of additional troops and Petraeus’ tactics relating to insurgency were the keys to success. No one can tell me different as i was out of the wire damn near every day working with Iraqi military in conjunction with our coalition forces.


59 posted on 12/06/2008 6:56:39 PM PST by eaglesiniowa ((Hope is not a course of action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson