Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
I was wholly unaware of that, considering the issue, why are we even having to repeat this all over again?

Because many people saw Garfield as a young, vital president, they probably didn't have to worry much about Arthur's background.

Because the people didn't raise holy heck back then and INSIST on a proper procedure to certify candidates to federal office, apathetic back then, woe to us today -- thanks a lot, people.

Am I correct in reading, the issue was never fully resolved? We still do not know whether or not Arthur was indeed a natural born citizen? 0bama will just use Arthur's presidency to justify his own, I'm sorry to say.

688 posted on 12/05/2008 1:33:31 PM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]


To: MozarkDawg

Am I correct in reading, the issue was never fully resolved?
***I don’t know. He certainly was president. But I don’t know if his qualifications were ever called into question formally in a court of law. That would be the precedent.


780 posted on 12/05/2008 7:15:17 PM PST by Kevmo (Palin/Hunter 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson