Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius Valerius
I’m saying that the Supreme Court will not weigh in on this issue because of the absurdly huge ramifications involved

Then what purpose does a "supreme" court have?
573 posted on 12/05/2008 12:19:06 PM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies ]


To: so_real
Then what purpose does a "supreme" court have?

To decide legal issues that are incapable of being resolved, for one reason or another, by the political process.

577 posted on 12/05/2008 12:21:08 PM PST by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]

To: so_real

good point...besides, justice is supposed to be “blind”. Justices are not supposed to take into account social reaction to their rulings. Their job is to make sure the law, in this cse the COnstitution, is applied.


588 posted on 12/05/2008 12:26:03 PM PST by SerafinQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]

To: so_real

This may have already been asked in this and other threads but why can’t the SCOTUS take the matter of BO’s eligibity on their own accord?

Isn’t that what checks and balances between 3 Co-equal branches of gubbermint are for?

Isn’t it the SCOTUS’ duty to make sure Congress and The President/President-elect follow the Constitution?

Why do cases have to be submitted(to SCOTUS) for them to apply the Supreme Law of the Land to themselves, Congress, or the President?


597 posted on 12/05/2008 12:31:41 PM PST by Electric Graffiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson