Would you care to amend this. I am saying Polarik prove who he is and his status as an expert. The other statements are “If” statements.
***No, I do not amend my statement. Your libels were not within conditional “if” statements, so you cannot weasel out of them. Who was it that showed up at the TV interview and signed affidavits in Berg Vs. Obama? It was Ron Polarik. He’s met the standard. You have not.
Ron Polarik has not shown up for TV interviews because he admits himself that isn't his name. Someone using the pseudonym Polarik showed up on interviews. Polarik says he signed affidavits, so, where are they? Are we putting too much faith in someone of whom, we don't even know his real name and admits he is providing a false name?
He’s met the standard. You have not.
I'm not making charges, I'm asking for evidence. I am not asking to 'meet a standard', I am asking that a person handing me what that person claims to be proof, meet the standard of proving he is an expert. If he is exactly who he is, credential wise, then he will have to, at a point, take this before a court and prove his expertise at that time. Why not now. We are asking the same of Bambi.
If you think asking these questions is libel, click abuse and have me banned.