Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Plaxico Buress (NYCs Gun Law is Unconstitutional)
The Wall Street Journal ^ | December 4, 2008 | David B. Kopel

Posted on 12/04/2008 5:34:20 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-398 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2008 5:34:20 AM PST by St. Louis Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Kopel is a 2nd Ammendent advocate. It’s abvious that he’s using this high profile case to bring the spotlight on himself.

Obviosuly, all the other schlemeils who have been charged with the same crime in recent months didn’t merit his attention.

Media whore.


2 posted on 12/04/2008 5:39:21 AM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

OH B.S. I am sure he could have gotten a carry permit if he at least tried. Many high profile celebs get them and carry.


3 posted on 12/04/2008 5:40:09 AM PST by Long Island Pete (Facts are stubborn things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

They will trump up charges against Burress and try to give him maximum time for gun possession. Yet some scumbag crackhead mugger will get probation and be back on the streets in 30 days.

Hell yes NYC gun laws are unconstitutional. Kelo vs DC decision applies there too IMHO.


4 posted on 12/04/2008 5:40:33 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Plaxident: a moronic accident costing one over 30 million dollars and or the loss of ones freedom for more than a year.

"I plaxidentally told the be-yatch neither of us would have any of the lottery and tore up the winning ticket, then hit her in the face with a forty ounce!"

5 posted on 12/04/2008 5:40:36 AM PST by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

He is a stupid thug that deserves what he gets. He could have easily injured or killed someone else. He isn’t required to carry large amounts of cash or “bling”. He knew he was breaking the law. Let him pay the price. This isn’t a second amendment issue, and in fact, hurts second amendment advocacy.


6 posted on 12/04/2008 5:41:30 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

He’s probley a liberal moron, let him burn in jail.

He is no doubt in the enemy camp and supports socislism in general.


7 posted on 12/04/2008 5:41:38 AM PST by stockpirate (Democrat Syndrome, psychological disorder that makes victims loyal to their abusers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

-bflr-


8 posted on 12/04/2008 5:42:01 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Lemme see...did Plexiglas vote for McCain or Obama?

He gets just what he deserves.


9 posted on 12/04/2008 5:43:49 AM PST by NeoConfederate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

Who is going to listen to him if he isn’t talking about a high profile case? The guys who fought DC waited for a long time for the “perfect” case to come along - are they media whores, or striking when the iron is hot?


10 posted on 12/04/2008 5:43:49 AM PST by thefrankbaum (Ad maiorem Dei gloriam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Actually he is not a thug. He turned out to be a pretty good receiver in the NFL. I think some are painting with a pretty broad brush. Ya, it was stupid to take a gun anywhere in N.Y. But CWPs are impossible to get there. Even for high profile people.

Bloomburg is the one who should be in jail for his sting opperations in other states. And of course his big mouth


11 posted on 12/04/2008 5:48:27 AM PST by 70th Division (I love my country but fear my government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative
Patient privacy verses public safety ...

HIPAA has tied up doctors and nurses with the threat of privacy law violations, while the City can commandeer any info they want under a “law enforcement” exemption.

This is a big time, high quality hospital that regularly treats celebrities with discretion. We may not like the double standard, but celebrities need a break from the paparazzi.

The real problem is NYC enforcement of the law and its arbitrariness.

The bigger problem, for Hizzonner Blommy, will come when he wants treatment at this hospital and they remember his little stunt for publicity.

12 posted on 12/04/2008 5:48:39 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Island Pete

Most celebs hire bodyguards for protection. Burress had the money but was ignorant. Trying to go through a metal detector to get into a club with a handgun was clearly a lost fumble.

I never thought firearms possession would be an elite only privlege while Mr common citizen in New York has no personal protection, because he can’t afford to buy his 2nd Amendment rights. Yet most elitists have armed bodyguards.
Could they be afraid of criminals too?


13 posted on 12/04/2008 5:48:51 AM PST by o_zarkman44 (Since when is paying more, but getting less, considered Patriotic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

Burris, despite all of his off-field antics, is a celebrated person and thus exposed to NFL nut cases (primarily Eagle, and Cowpie fans). He has a legitmate Constitutional right to carry a firearm for personal protection...he should, however, be charged with illegally discharging a firearm in a public place.


14 posted on 12/04/2008 5:50:00 AM PST by meandog (Wasilla warrior in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

He may be a media whore and Plaxico Burriss is an idiot.

It doesn’t make him anyless right.

I am a CCW permit holder in NY state and my CCW permit is valid in any county EXCEPT NYC !!!

Why am I barred from carrying my CCW in NYC? as opposed to Rochester or Albany or Watertown where I can carry my weapon at any time?


15 posted on 12/04/2008 5:50:36 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Never underestimate the ability of a liberal to deny reality and attempt to change the rules to do s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
He is guilty of reckless endangerment, perhaps sundry things like discharging a firearm within *(fill in the blank). Regardless of what else he may or may not have done, he is facing jail time simply for carrying a firearm, which is an explicitly protected right. If it isn't a 2nd amendment issue nothing is.

How come every time someone tries to defend what the 2nd Amendment actually says there is some clown that pops out of the woodwork and states "don't defend this, it hurt 2nd Amendment advocacy". If we listened to the nattering nabobs no 2nd Amendment issue would ever be defended.
16 posted on 12/04/2008 5:52:16 AM PST by Durus (The People have abdicated our duties and anxiously hopes for just two things, "Bread and Circuses")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Durus
How come every time someone tries to defend what the 2nd Amendment actually says there is some clown that pops out of the woodwork and states "don't defend this, it hurt 2nd Amendment advocacy". If we listened to the nattering nabobs no 2nd Amendment issue would ever be defended.

He broke the law. He knew he was breaking the law. He had other options. He was drinking. He is a boob and a thug. He thought being able to catch a ball made him above the law.

Sending him to jail would at least prevent him from carrying in the future. He obviously can't be trusted with a gun and don't call me a clown.

17 posted on 12/04/2008 5:58:39 AM PST by Soliton (This 2 shall pass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

...yawn....another pro athlete shot in a club...who cares....happens every week.


18 posted on 12/04/2008 6:02:31 AM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division
“He turned out to be a pretty good receiver in the NFL.”

And Ray Lewis is a pretty good defenseman. He's a good player the laws do not apply. I don't think so. He took a loaded weapon into a crowded bar and shot himself. He would've shot himself whether or not he had a permit to carry. He should be charged with 2 counts of dumb-a$$.

19 posted on 12/04/2008 6:02:45 AM PST by repubpub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: St. Louis Conservative

You betcha. Sounds good to me.


20 posted on 12/04/2008 6:03:40 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-398 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson