Just another anonymous reference to the same stuff. Not credentials or a bio. How do you know that the "obamabirth" site wasn't put up by "Madison" or vice versa? If John proclaims Jane to be an expert on something and Jane proclaims John to be an expert on the same topic and they go around quoting each other, does it make either of them experts or what they say true? It is just a shell game. It goes on all the time among the global warming/environmental crowd, as their assertions are generally based on cherry picked or completely fabricated data. But they all go around referencing each other to create the impression of consensus/credibility. It is a way of fabricating credibility where none exists or should exist. It is also known in programming parlance as a "circular reference." This phenemonon also comes in the pyramid scheme variety.