[centurion316]

I was unaward that the Supreme Court had ruled on the meaning of natural born citizen as it is used in the Constitution.

[BP2]

>>> I was unaware that the Supreme Court had ruled on the meaning of natural born citizen as it is used in the Constitution.

Haven't you heard? Non-Sequitur has a direct hotline to Danny Bickel's office. He's warning Bickel of the the 30 other suits headed toward the SCOTUS, regardless of what happens with Donofrio's case ...

"Danny, also tell 'Renegade' to be on standby with a REX 84 unit and EXECUTIVE ORDER 10995 -- we have some rowdy Freepers over here." LOL

[Non-Sequitur]

I was unaward that the Supreme Court had ruled on the meaning of natural born citizen as it is used in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has ruled that a person born in the U.S. is a citizen at birth. Likewise a person born overseas of two parents who are U.S. citizens. If there is a difference between that and a natural born citizen then where is that difference defined? Where does the law detail three classifications of citizenship? Surely one of you can point so some authoritative source that gives that answer? Can't you?

[Tublecane]

“I was unaward that the Supreme Court had ruled on the meaning of natural born citizen as it is used in the Constitution.”

You are, of course, aware that SCOTUS has ruled on who is a citizen at birth? Well, I’m no Dutch philosopher, but I think citizen at birth and natural born citizen are the same thing.