Tublecane; BP2; calenel; LucyT
[BP2 wrote: “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” — Ronald Reagan]
Now BP2, I don’t think Reagan was speaking to the same very distinct matter. Are you then sympathizing with the libs and libertarians who decry the “natural born” phrase as outmoded in a globalist world? Now if really one extrapolated on this quote of President Reagan’s, we’d surely have plenty of easily qualified natural born candidates to be elected (from) among the rabble in some corner of the US after a nuclear war, or whatever one can imagine….well, a civil war, which has been offered as a very real possibility if this “electee” does this or that. You’d need to establish electors and all the rest, who needn’t be natural born. The Confederacy I assume did with election of Jefferson Davis.
Safe to say you’d have plenty natural-borners to choose from to lead, unless someone’s developed and deploys a neutron bomb that especially takes us out.
After reading about British rights in regards their claim to citizens and succeeding descendants through blood inheritance, I now realize that Mother England never fully accepted American Independence.
Now I understand the meaning behind the recurring practice of tracing blood lines to the British Crown of winning Presidents. Ever noticed with every ‘change’ of administration MSM reports, in various ways, an ancestor discovery of some sort? I saw this happen with Bill Clinton, G. Bush, and just recently I read a report of BHO and Cheney whose related with common ancestry.
When GW Bush was elected there was an entire News segment on an event in which the Queen took Bush on a personal tour of her vaulted books of genealogical records. The report was that the Queen was showing him their common ancestors who were related. NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY... as Mother England has always sought to blood tie herself through common descendants of America. The outcome was/is to secure allegiance and influence American leadership to eventually rule over her indirectly than possibly directly.
So ultimately Mother England finaly has her DIRECT blood tied Native son in BHO and it seems ‘they’ will have DIRECT rule over America. His role must have been a long plan in the making.
It's possible the Annenberg foundation, Ford foundations, and others have developed specific programs to GROW special individuals for Mother England's future use. Through indirect support of chosen children and family's it's possibly they helped support BHO since boyhood. Didn't BHO’s mother work for the Ford foundation? What about Walter Annenberg that foundations father? It turns Walter Annenberg was appointed under President Reagan as Ambassidor to the COURT OF ST. JAMES directly tied to Mother England.