“AH, well, what part of the law says that Dual Citizenship, which is not currently recognized by the US, is ‘OKAY’?”
Uh, well, the part that doesn’t say it doesn’t accept dual citizenship. If nothing says dual citizenship isn’t allowable, then dual citizenship is allowable.
Where do you get the part about the U.S. not currently recognizing dual citizenship? My understanding is the exact opposite.
Historical works are not the law. The Declaration of Independence has no significance as law in the United States of America (which came into being with the Constitution).
“However, just five years later, Congress met to clarify certain parts of the previous Naturalization Act. Among other things, the Naturalization Act of 1795 removed the words ‘natural born’ from this statement”
So what?
You might want to take a look at this:
http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html
Go take a look at Vol 7 of the US Foreign Affairs Manual regarding Dual Citizenship, then get back to me...