A proven forgery (link on this thread). Why would he do that if he's not hiding anything?
"Hawaii officials verified the original is on file in Honolulu."
But not its contents.
“A proven forgery (link on this thread).”
“Proven” by whom? I followed a lot of these links and they all ended back at Berg and his compatriots. Having some experience enduring the photo “proof” of 911 conspirators that the Pentagon never got hit etc. I’m a little leery of said ‘proof’ from that quarter. I also came across rebuttals more compelling that claimed those experts either didn’t know their business or were fudging on the supposed ‘discrepancies.’
“Why would he do that if he’s not hiding anything?
If it’s fake, why would they do it at *all?* If there was something to hide, trying to pass a fake off to the world on the internet would seem the height of lunacy. Better to release nothing than to damn yourself completely with a fake that lots more people outside 911 ‘truthers’ and their ilk would be exposing.
BS.