Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wndawmn666

This is a great comment, except for the part where it’s utterly wrong and ignores the common law interpretation of “natural born citizen” as it existed in 1787.

One good explanation:
http://volokh.com/posts/1204265246.shtml


472 posted on 12/04/2008 5:00:49 PM PST by kenboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 462 | View Replies ]


To: kenboy

Please note that our Framers had just liberated themselves from British Common Law. Why on Earth would they go ahead and adopt Common Law rule here?

If you are interested in why we don’t follow common law please take a few minutes to read this:

http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

Scroll down to: LEO DONOFRIO COMMENTS ON JUDAH BENJAMIN ARTICLE CONCERNING NATURAL BORN CITIZEN AND THE COMMON LAW

It’s a simple explanation.


485 posted on 12/04/2008 5:33:14 PM PST by wndawmn666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 472 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson