Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobRoy

>>Actually, if one puts their views on a forum they should, in fact, expect debate<<

Debate about the subject matter, cool.
Debate about religious dogma, no way.

Like I said, no one asks the Jewish FReepers to defend their beliefs when they post something non-dogmatic. Why should anyone have to debate dogma on a non-dogmatic thread?

It’s crass.

If I post a thread on why communion is not communion is a Protestant church, I better be ready to debate dogma because that is what I have invited.

If I post that three first communicants were run over by a car at a parish, why is that an invitation to debate dogma?

This is an actual example. A Catholic FReeper posted an article on glass walls being installed in confessionals. The second post was slamming the dogma of confession.
Come on.


313 posted on 12/03/2008 1:56:12 PM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: netmilsmom

The best way to handle that (in my opinion) if you think it’s inappropriate, is to ignore it.


316 posted on 12/03/2008 1:59:31 PM PST by brytlea (You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson