Then you won’t mind showing us—from the thread and article I linked to—where he’s in error. ... We’ll wait for you to read the pertinent data instead of just popping off from your n00b mouth.
Sure, no problem, how about his claim that:
I have REPEATEDLY stated that Obama can release a golden birth certificate signed by 100 gazzillion witnesses embossed in gold leaf that he was born on the mall in Washington DC and it still wouldnt make him a Natural Born Citizen under the Constitution because he was, regardless of where he was born, a BRITISH citizen at birth. Since he was born as a British citizen/subject, his United States citizenship was not natural.
This argument has no support in the Constitution or Federal statutory or case law. What Donofrio is arguing, essentially, is that foreign countries can, by passing a law, disqualify Americans from the Presidency. So, North Korea would pass a law stating that henceforth, any American citizen from birth is also a citizen of North Korea, thereby disqualifying anyone after the date of such law from serving as President.
Granted, this hypothetical is unlikely to happen, but it just illustrates how untenable his position is, in that it looks to foreign citizenship laws, rather than the laws of the US, to determine whether or not one is qualified to server as President.