[oyez]

World leaders are just going to have step up and declare the jihadists just what they are; evil, ignorant, and dangerious. Being silent is unfair to Muslims that want to coexist and everybody else, for that mater..

We can wipe terrorists by the butt load, but with out widespread condemnation the extremist block feels justified.

[American in Israel]

The premise of being prepared for terrorist attacks is mistake in its foundation. It is reactionary, not proactionary. It hands the initiative to the enemy, who can pick and choose soft targets at will.

The only way to win the war that we are in is to win the war, not mop up after the battles. We must hold each Islamic Nation responsible for its citizens actions. They choose to be Islamic Nations under Sharia Law, they must be held accountable for their citizens just like every western nation is responsible for its official government representatives.

Accordingly, Pakistan just openly did an act of war on India, India not only has the right, but the responsibility to hold Pakistan responsible, up to and including the possibility of a full scale military attack on Pakistan.

We accordingly should sue Saudi Arabia for damages done on 9-11, including the option of erasing Mecca with a nuclear exchange if that is what it takes to make these Islamic Nation reign in their radicals.

To continue to follow the method of attempting to harden every soft target in the free world will make the world not free.

Which is why I suspect we have taken the obviously foolish approach of trying to do so. Islam is being used as and excuse by a much larger set of wicked leaders to take our freedom away. It is pretty foolish to believe that Nations that cannot build airplanes are declaring war on Nations that put men on the moon a generation ago, and getting away with it.

[ansel12]

“Why was India — a nation that has suffered enormously from terrorism in the past seven years — unprepared for the Mumbai attacks? And why are America, Britain and most of the rest of the civilized world equally unprepared even now, so many years after 9-11?

London’s Telegraph reported Monday that “the former head of Britain’s SAS has revealed that Britain is not adequately prepared for a Mumbai-style terror attack. He said hundreds of civilians would have been massacred if such an assault was carried out in this country.”

---

The movie the “Final Option” was about the 1980s SAS raid at the (London Embassy?) it was successful and the star in it was an actual reserve unit SAS member or trainee or something.

The US and Britain may not be “prepared” for something that no country is “prepared” for but they can sure react quickly. India did not do that.

[rawcatslyentist]

>"why are America, Britain and most of the rest of the civilized world equally unprepared even now, so many years after 9-11? "

Because we choose to co-exist with the murderous children of satanallah, instead of incarcerating/destroying them. As long as mecca isn't a glow in the dark glass parking lot, we all remain targets of the war declared 1400 years ago.

[Jack Hammer]

Although clearly there were security lapses in this whole India mess, to be fair - just how DOES one prepare for something like that? I mean, if kids willing to die are ready to mass into hotels, shopping malls, city centers, train stations, bus depots, sports venues etc. etc. etc. with the intention simply to mow down anyone and everyone they see... how do you prevent it without hiring the entire labor force of the United States to guard everything, everywhere and stand watch on every street corner, 24/7?

[JTWildfeather]

I think that the Mumbai Massacre was another covert act on the part of a major government to create a pretext for rfid chipping. Can you imagine the rich and world leaders removing their belts and shoes every time they entered a five star hotel?