No need to yell with cap letters.
How about disproving the content of the commentary, rather than just denouncing it all as “untrue”?
Of course that would require some effort.
“How about disproving the content of the commentary...”
The author disproves himself in this sentence, “All it takes is a bit of manipulation of the numbers.”
>>How about disproving the content of the commentary, rather than just denouncing it all as “untrue”?<<
There is really nothing to disprove. It is just a bunch of fun with numbers followed by BFCs (big fat claims).