Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN
I don't think the U.S. Supreme Court would be satisfied just accepting Fukino’s word, even under oath (when a official document exists). It would be considered by most (true patriots) as dodging the issue completely and having no creditability. I hope for better than this from the court (at least 4 justices, possibly 5).
Just hoping, guessing and praying.
185 posted on 12/01/2008 9:32:37 AM PST by The Cajun (Mind numbed robot , ditto-head, Hannitized, Levinite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: The Cajun
The court would not be the entity Obama would be answering to. The court would kick the can down the road by instructing Obama that he ‘must provide his vault proof of nature born citizen’. The court would not be the arbiter of the validity of the provided document or the process used to provide the documentation.
208 posted on 12/01/2008 10:19:51 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson