Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jz638
“I’d think this would lessen Sen. Clinton’s importance as Sec State, possibly by a lot.”

Not if Obama appoints Bill to the UN cabinet position. Then we have a 100% Clinton foreign policy. I can't imagine HIllary would stand for being made window dressing by diminishing the role of the Sec. of State. Why would she give up her Senate seat for that? There's more here than meets the eye. Having said that, it wouldn't have been bad to have Bolton in the Bush cabinet.

32 posted on 11/30/2008 8:45:48 PM PST by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: pieceofthepuzzle

Bill Clinton? the whole point of picking hillary was to take her out of the senate and to throw a bone to the centrists. Obama is in charge of this WH now.


51 posted on 11/30/2008 10:25:10 PM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson