Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lewisglad

Personally I would like to see none of the above. We need a new Reagan. None of these are a new Reagan.


2 posted on 11/30/2008 3:01:21 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

In case you haven’t heard yet, Reagan died in 2004. He won’t be coming back any time soon.


8 posted on 11/30/2008 3:03:41 PM PST by GipperGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

Newt.


9 posted on 11/30/2008 3:03:45 PM PST by big'ol_freeper (Gen. George S. Patton to Michael Moore... American Carol: "I really like slapping you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
Personally I would like to see none of the above. We need a new Reagan. None of these are a new Reagan.

I like Palin, but my first pick is still Ducan Hunter.

56 posted on 11/30/2008 3:35:45 PM PST by DejaJude (Proud denizen of the fighting fringe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

Palin and Jendal are the new Reagan.
We should have a candidate who is conservative,qualified
name Recognition and can go toe to toe with the
opposition and can speak articulately.
Also we don’t need a person whose adult kids are at home
while others are serving their country at war.


62 posted on 11/30/2008 3:40:01 PM PST by SoCalPol (In Defeat: Defiance - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

wow thats to bad cause Sarah has my vote, guess we are still divided and were not gonna win for years to come.....bet you were one those lesser than two evil types huh. John McClaim was why we lost!!!!!!!


67 posted on 11/30/2008 3:43:38 PM PST by VaRepublican (I would propagate taglines but I don't know how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

Comparing any potential candidate to Reagan is as dumb as comparing Obama to Lincoln or FDR, IMO.


79 posted on 11/30/2008 3:59:14 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
>>We need a new Reagan.<< You (and a lot of other people) are thinking about this the wrong way. Reagan was the right man at the right time, but there isn't another Reagan. The next time the country rallies around a conservative, it will be because someone else has emerged as the right man or woman at the right time - but in a different way, for a different time. He or she will be (we can only hope) as much of an original as Reagan, and therefore, probably, not like Reagan at all.
107 posted on 11/30/2008 4:20:21 PM PST by FelixFelicis (When can we *change* back? [Get yer bumper sticker at www.cafepress.com/deepright!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant

ABR

Anyone but Romney

How about some new faces?


166 posted on 11/30/2008 5:57:32 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion ("I've got a bracelet too, Jim")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Brilliant
Personally I would like to see none of the above. We need a new Reagan. None of these are a new Reagan.

Absolutely. Here we go again. Factionalism. None of the above will bring the party together. Look to the Reaganites.

206 posted on 11/30/2008 10:37:45 PM PST by roamer_1 (Proud 1%er... Reagan Conservatism is the only way forward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson