Justice Clarence Thomas and the Obama factor

Family Security Matters ^ | Saturday, November 29 | Dave Bertrand,

[ckilmer]

HOME > PUBLICATIONS > Oval Office Watch – Saturday, November 29

• IN THIS SECTION

November 29, 2008

Oval Office Watch – Saturday, November 29

Oval Office Watch

 

See facts concerning Obama’s missing birth certificate RIGHT HERE.

 

Justice Clarence Thomas and the Obama factor

Dave Bertrand, Traffic AlertUSA.com

 

The Obama "conspiracy theory" is reaching new heights beyond anyone's comprehension...or at least the comprehension of those that voted for this dynamic man. Dynamic in the sense that our Supreme Court on December 5th, will either put this all to rest and the voters will continue to believe in their messiah, or it will turn this country upside down. With many lawsuits backing-up and Justice Clarence Thomas now coming forth to unravel the dynamics of this conspiracy, our constitution is in crisis, but this is also an opportunity for the "World President" Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetero, Dunham or whatever his name is to forge ahead with his quote unquote, "International Order" which means "The New World Order."

 

But that's just ridiculous thinking and there's no way our government would allow a non-citizen to scam his way into the presidency?? And of course Bill Clinton "did not have sex with that woman," or George H. Bush didn't mean that "read my lips...no new taxes" was just a slip of the tongue, and Nixon was truthful when he said that he was "not a crook." Every president has lied and this president-elect may be slicker than willy himself, or more than any president we have ever had.

 

Simple enough for president-elect Obama to put this all to rest himself, is to provide his college records, medical records and the super secret vault birth certificate that is being kept under seal of being (possibly), the biggest embarrassment of this country's history and a major let-down to the African/American community that deserve a president, much like the charisma that Obama displays. Should he get a "free pass" if he is lying? In my opinion...this whole Obama conspiracy cannot be contained by both the corporate media and both the republican and democratic parties, and like most conspiracies....the "powers at be" will just get to the point with the American people and say, "so what!! What are you going to do about it??"  

 

"Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetero, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham are all names that our president-elect has been known to use throughout his life."

 

"It has been shown that in 1981 Obama traveled to Pakistan using an Indonesian passport. At the time of his travels to Indonesia, Obama was twenty years old. He was well aware he maintained his Indonesian citizenship, and had yet to regain his United States citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship."

 

"The Obama campaign took great delight in pointing out that John McCain ranked 894th out of a graduating class of 899 at the U.S. Naval Academy. However do you know where Mr. Obama ranked in his graduating class at Occidental, Columbia or Harvard? You don’t know because Obama would not release any of his school records."

 

"A case that challenges President-elect Barack Obama’s name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has been scheduled for a “conference” at the U.S. Supreme Court." [Scheduled for December 5th, 2008] Read article.

[autumnraine]

According to a document a poster posted earlier, all that was needed for the state of Rhode Island was a signed statement that said “I certify that this candidate is qualified constitutionally to hold this office” signed by Barack and two witnesses.

So yeah, we are supposed to take his word.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2139899/posts

[BlessedBeGod]

I don’t believe that the Justices will declare him ineligible.

They’d have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives. There’d be too many people who would want to get revenge for the Supreme Court’s decision.

[autumnraine]

Hey! Did they ever really prove he went to Pakistan on an Indonesian passport? I had heard it speculated due to travel rules at the time, but never anything concrete.

[Mogollon]

....the "powers at be" will just get to the point with the American people and say, "so what!! What are you going to do about it??"

I think there is going to be hell to pay.

[RegulatorCountry]

They’d have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives. There’d be too many people who would want to get revenge for the Supreme Court’s decision.

Didn't stop them with desegregation, and emotions ran very high about that for many years, still do in some places. Didn't stop them with Roe v. Wade, with the same result. Either we are a Constitutional Republic or we are not. Enforce the provisions.

[TonyStark]

I don’t believe that the Justices will declare him ineligible. They’d have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives. There’d be too many people who would want to get revenge for the Supreme Court’s decision.

I hear ya, but consider this: Judges regularly sentence mob kingpins. Granted, the Democrat Party is the largest mob in America, but I think the mindset of Justice Thomas is robust enough in the face of political opposition to actually uphold the Constitution, TeeVee editorials and illiterates by the 10s of millions be damned.

[IbJensen]

...there's no way our government would allow a non-citizen to scam his way into the presidency??

I wouldn't want to bet my ranch on it.

This egotistical, empty-suited socialist, trojan horse fits nicely into the plan our puppetmasters have in mind.

Americans may wake up from this stupor they're in over this bozo.

[cripplecreek]

Either we are a Constitutional Republic or we are not.

Damn straight. The constitution is the supreme law of the land and even overrides the will of the voters.

[nclaurel]

It was my understanding that the SC is not being asked to rule him ineligible, but rather to rule that candidates must show their birth certificates/proof of being natural born citizens. It would be Obama not the SC that showed he was ineligible by being unable to show the proof. But since this would be a ruling that covered all candidates it could not be said to target only him.

[CMAC51]

I don’t believe that the Justices will declare him ineligible. They’d have to look over their shoulders for the rest of their lives. There’d be too many people who would want to get revenge for the Supreme Court’s decision.

It is very easy to believe that the supremes would choose to avoid a crisis. The one thought that comes to mind though is what did the oath of office mean to Justice Roberts when he was sworn in. Is he a man who could take that oath then stand and swear in a president that was potentially unconstitutional? I know I couldn't do it. Can he? That is what we the people don't know.

[tioga]

the Supreme Court ruled in the 2000 election, I believe they will stand by the constitution.

[RegulatorCountry]

I just don’t understand all this bleating about “overriding the will of the voters” from the left, anyway. Haven’t Federal circuit court judges routinely done just that, in California and elsewhere? They’re trying to override the will of the voters regarding Prop. 8 in CA right this very moment. So, this argument doesn’t wash with me.

Here, we have a candidate, a complete cipher, who has concealed just about everything pertaining to his life leading up to election, who has had questions raised about his eligibility for office, almost from the outset, who is absolutely unabashed about using legal technicalities to remove his own opposition. What’s the problem, then? Hold him to account.

[Ahithophel]

In situations like that, all that’s needed is for the Justices to roll out Justice “Per Curiam” - a means whereby the Justices issue an opinion without ascribing it to any particular Justice (assuming its unanimous - big assumption, but they are the guardians of the Constitution after all).

[cripplecreek]

The SOB needs to follow his own advice.

Let me also say that I remain distressed that the White House during this confirmation process, which overall went smoothly, failed to provide critical documents as part of the record that could have provided us with a better basis to make our judgment with respect to the nomination. This White House continues to stymie efforts on the part of the Senate to do its job. I hope with the next nominee who comes up for the Supreme Court that the White House recognizes that in fact it is its duty not just to the Senate but to the American people to make sure we can thoroughly and adequately evaluate the record of every single nominee who comes before us.

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama on the Confirmation of Judge John Roberts

[ponygirl]

Very good article. Go read the whole thing.

[RegulatorCountry]

Disclosure for thee, but not for me.

[hinckley buzzard]

I agree. And have for the duration. The SC will not overturn the election, which is what is at stake. They didn't even really want to get involved in 2000 but they had to after the SC of Florida went rogue and did violence to its own laws.

I don't know just what their legalistic excuse will be, but they will duck this issue.

[thesetruths]

Fabulous find!

[RGPII]

Let me also say that I remain distressed that the White House during this confirmation process, which overall went smoothly, failed to provide critical documents as part of the record that could have provided us with a better basis to make our judgment with respect to the nomination. This White House continues to stymie efforts on the part of the Senate to do its job. I hope with the next nominee who comes up for the Supreme Court that the White House recognizes that in fact it is its duty not just to the Senate but to the American people to make sure we can thoroughly and adequately evaluate the record of every single nominee who comes before us. - BHO

First I'd seen this. Thanks for showing us.