Doesn’t Obama fit one or more of these categories? Or are these only applicable to the term “citizen”, but not necessarily “natural born”? I read the website you linked, but am not necessarily convinced.
* Anyone born inside the United States
* Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person’s status as a citizen of the tribe
* Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
* Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
* Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
* Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
* A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
I believe all apply but for the first statement. Here’s why:
Many diplomats and business personnel are stationed here with their families. Both parents are resident aliens. They can choose whether their children are registered in their home countries and these children, whose births can be registered in the U.S. and considered for citizenship when they are 18 years old, can make a choice to be a U.S. citizen when an adult. But, they would never be considered “natural born” as the parents were foreign citizens and not U.S.
Foreign nationals here without documentation have committed felonies in being here illegally. Any of their children born here are also considered to be foreign nationals. All these so called anchor babies, whose parents are illegal aliens, are NOT U.S. citizens just because they are born here. If the parents are here as legal residents, then yes, they can be considered potential U.S. citizens.
I’m not making this stuff up. It is all called out in Federal Statutes. Any one, claiming to be an Immigration lawyer or who claims to be working for such a lawyer, can challenge the above information and state that this information is false. But there are a lot of lawyers who earn an income trying to tear down the Constitution, and who are dedicated to changing it.
Don’t get sucked into their lies.