Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zarodinu

No offense taken. But please consider the following from the man who penned the 14th Amendment in 1871. Rep. John A. Bingham gave a definition of Natural Born Citizen, which stated in part:

“every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.”

http://federalistblog.us/2008/11/natural-born_citizen_defined.html

So, to restate Rep. Bingham’s definition of “natural born” in 21st century terms:

1. Born on U.S. soil;

2. Parents are citizens at the time of birth.

I’m not smart enough to make this stuff up!


124 posted on 11/28/2008 8:33:29 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: SatinDoll; little jeremiah

Thank you for the link, its the best case I have seen yet for your argument. Nonetheless, I still believe that anybody born in the US or born to US citizens outside of US is a natural born citizen.

My argument comes from the following article

http://yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/pryor_note.pdf

Its a great five minute read, and in my view is the best summary of the controversy. Anybody who is interested in the issue should read it.

Once again, if Obama is a citizen, but is not a naturalized citizen, and is not a natural born citizen, what exactly is he?

Since there are only two kinds of citizens, if he is not naturalized, he is automatically natural born.


131 posted on 11/28/2008 9:10:03 PM PST by zarodinu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson