I have read most the arguments, which are pure speculation. The Wong case seems to set the precedent for birthright citizenship. The Constitution does not provide an explicit definition of natural born, especially as it applies to the Presidency. No one knows what SCOTUS would decide since the issue has never been raised to that level legally.
Don’t you find it odd that not one judge has sup’d the COLB?
“I have read most the arguments, which are pure speculation. The Wong case seems to set the precedent for birthright citizenship. The Constitution does not provide an explicit definition of natural born, especially as it applies to the Presidency. No one knows what SCOTUS would decide since the issue has never been raised to that level legally.”
No, but the Constitution does differentiate. The Wong case, IMO, is not pertinent as it pertains to US citizenship. You are correct however that SCOTUS will have to decide. It is all speculation at this point (mine and yours included), the real question ... how will they decide? And furthermoe, will we have an enforceable Constitution after it is over?