Belgian Couple Sells Baby on EBay

LifeSite News ^ | November 26, 2008 | Hilary White

[NYer]

GHENT, Belgium, November 26, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A Belgian couple faces possible jail time for having sold their newborn child on eBay and for having registered the child under an assumed name.
 
A Belgium state prosecutor said, “The couple are suspected of registering the birth under a false name, which is an offence. That is to say that the name the baby boy was given was not that of his real mother.” The offence carries a maximum sentence of ten years in prison. According to iafrica.com, obtaining an adoption without official authorization, a charge to which the couple may have to answer for the eBay sale, carries a maximum sentence of five years.

The pair, who have not been named, are a man 26 and woman aged 24 and are under investigation by police and social services in the town of Ghent after it was revealed that they had offered their second child on eBay to a Dutch couple for an undisclosed sum.

A spokesman for the Belgian prosecutor’s office said the couple had decided not to keep the child because of money problems. The amount paid for the baby has not been disclosed but it was described as a “decent five figure sum” and the Belgian authorities have decided not to remove the baby from his “adoptive” parents. Het Laatse Nieuws reports that the baby was handed over to a couple from the Netherlands in the hospital parking lot shortly after he was born in July. 

While critics are saying that this incident could be the start of the buying and selling of children over the internet, in fact, babies have been appearing on the internet for sale for some time. In May this year, police in Vancouver, British Columbia were called when an online ad was spotted offering to sell a baby girl for Cn. $10,000. The ad said "Must have!!!! $10,000, a new baby girl, healthy and very cute. Can't afford and unexpected, Looking for a good home, Please call ASAP" and included a cell phone number.

In Salt Lake City in March, Police instigated a search for a baby girl who had been advertised "for sale" on a local online classified listing. The child was listed under "Baby & Children Items" at a cost of US $6,560, police said.

Pro-life analysts have long warned that widespread legalized abortion has triggered a vast cultural shift in western countries from the idea of a child as a gift from God to that of the child as either an insupportable financial burden or a luxury commodity that can be purchased or sold, or, as in the case of artificial reproductive technologies, made to order.

As early as 1986 the Catholic Church was warning that a fundamental shift had occurred in the way children were viewed. That year the Vatican issued a document, titled Donum Vitae (the Gift of Life) signed by the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, that warned that the artificial reproductive technologies industry had created a situation in which human beings could be bought and sold.

Calling artificial procreation a set of procedures characterised by a “dynamic of violence and domination,” the document said, “The abortion-mentality which has made this procedure possible...leads, whether one wants it or not, to man's domination over the life and death of his fellow human beings and can lead to a system of radical eugenics.”

“The child is not an object to which one has a right, nor can he be considered as an object of ownership: rather, a child is a gift, ‘the supreme gift.’”

Read related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Christian Medical Association Condemns “Baby Supermarket”
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/jan/07010905.html

Feminist Revolutionary Warns of Exploitation of Women with Cloning Research

[pray4liberty]

On this day when we thank God for his many gifts, including our children, some like these treat them as commodities.

Trafficking in human flesh is nothing new. Maybe these two figured they'd rather make money than abort the baby.

(Sigh) the adoption process needs to be made easier.

[civis]

I think we would all benefit from a new orphanage system. The old orphanage wheel-in-the-wall saved countless unborn lives.

[lymelady]

I don’t think anyone is saying the baby would be better off dead, just that this is not an acceptable alternative to abortion and it isn’t morally better to traffic humans than it is to kill them; either way, the human being in question becomes an object to be abused. On one level, the outcome is different and you’re right in that this way the child has more hope and a chance at life, but that doesn’t mean it’s morally better, especially when there are options that bypass any human rights violations.

Adoption is a good alternative. And if those people are that eager to buy a baby, they would have been just as eager to a listing that said, “Adopt our child, we will transfer custody to you, all we ask is that you help us with the medical bills and legal fees.”

[returnofthemack]

Thank you! You did a much better job of explaining what I was thinking than I did.