Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Coyoteman; metmom; Fichori; GodGunsGuts; valkyry1; MrB; Elsie; betty boop

In other words, it is an application of the scientific method. Nothing unusual about that—that’s what science does.

So how does this differ from religion?

Science relies on evidence, and the testing of theories based on that evidence. Religion relies on dogma and belief, and is not subject to tests using the scientific method.


Uh-huh...now show us all the godless liberal NEA lunatics lining up to sue the proponents of this multiverse “theory” into silence because they can not come up with the demanded “scientific evidence” or “proof”.

They will NEED a theory? Now that’s curious, the same courtesy wasn’t extended to the chemist and others that proposed that chemicals don’t just up and form life all by themselves.

Quite the disconnect, per usual.


65 posted on 11/27/2008 3:05:44 PM PST by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: tpanther

Science talks about multiple universes with a straight face when there’s not one shred of evidence to support that they exist. But if we are told about the multiple universes and they are called *heaven* and *hell*, then it’s OK to mock and ridicule them.

Looks like science is just catching up to Scripture again.


86 posted on 11/27/2008 5:24:12 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson