I am not a troll; you, on the other hand, are a rude, self-centered fool who insulted me because I dared comment on a news article in a way you didn't like.
You don't own the thread. I read the piece, and gave my opinion. You told me to shut up and offered no argument, no discussion, just a childish "Shut up, troll!" schoolgirl response.
If you don't like free speech, you really don't belong here. If someone posts a comment that DARES to differ from yours, either engage the meat of the comment, or say nothing. When you post "Shut up, troll!" you come off as a very scared, very weak person. When you shoot from the dark corner of the Internet, in a way you'd never say to my face, you get what you get. Don't like it? Tough.
So--either have the intelligence and maturity to understand that all of us have the right to comment on the article and the attention this subject gets, and that YOU don't get to decide what's the "PC" attitude to take around here...or simply scroll past. There are plenty of folks here who will parrot back your point of view, since that's the thing that helps your insecurity.
I generated a definition of Troll, and your response is the Nixonian “I am not a troll”. How’s that for a superior intellectual response. It ain’t. Then you move onto how you don’t like me so that you can deflect from the definition of troll and how it applies to you.
Maybe I am rude. If so, then you are an A&�|e on top of being a troll.
So you want someone to address the meat of your posted statement? Here goes. But you need to address the meat of the definition of troll on a constitutionalist website and how that does or does not apply to you. You are a troll.
At least Bush hasn’t been overcome by Obama Insanity Syndrome
***Use of hyperbole to exaggerate the other side’s argument, a form of straw argumentation.
and this ridiculous story
***How is it ridiculous? From the very beginning, all zer0bama had to do was produce the BC to whomever asks, just as McCain did. If it were truly ridiculous, it would not be on the docket of the Supreme Court of the US.
being pushed by the deadenders
***So you wish to use exaggerated, hyperbolic language but don’t want your feet held to the fire as a troll? If you don’t like free speech, you really don’t belong here.
who somehow think that even if this birth certificate were proven fake Obama wouldn’t be sworn in as president.
***If the birth certificate were proven fake before the Electoral College meets, there is a very high likelihood that Obama would not be sworn in as president. The “somehow” is what the supreme court is all about.
You are obviously “out of sync” with conservatives who are dedicated to supporting the Constitution. From the things you’ve said, it would appear to fit the role of “troll” much more than the role of most FReepers and their respect for the Constitution.
There’s no question about it, this is a major Constitutional issue. McCain had the same question about his birth and he solved it almost immediately by turning over his birth certificate. And that was it by McCain.
With Obama, he fights and spends hundreds of thousands of dollars on lawyers and court fees and costs, spread out over various states — all so he doesn’t have to get a $10 document to show he’s qualified under the Constitution.
Something is seriously wrong here...