Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: publius1

Timothy McVeigh was an idiot. He could have been a national hero and done the country some good bombing the NYT building...with no one there of course. According to Ayers, it’s not terrorism if you target a building and not people.


4 posted on 11/23/2008 6:21:42 AM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GBA

Never thought of that. He would have gotten off if no one was hurt. Then he could have done the talk circuit, like ayers.


8 posted on 11/23/2008 6:24:21 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Obozo.....friend of dictators and wannabee revoluuuushionaries !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GBA

McVeigh was a gutless coward and a terrorist and would be regarded as such no matter what building he blew up and whether or not he killed or injured anyone.

He would never be a national hero.


30 posted on 11/23/2008 6:36:37 AM PST by Francis McClobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: GBA

The only differences between Timothy McVeigh and Bill Ayers is the Timothy McVeigh was drug-addled when he planned and committed his acts, and he was a lot more competent than Ayers.

Of course, another difference is the McVeigh didn’t have a President Elect as a close personal friend.

But hey, who is counting.


72 posted on 11/23/2008 7:27:51 AM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson