Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freelance Warrior
No reason for CO2 ratio to be treated differently.

What about O2(a by-product of electrolysis when producing hydrogen for fuel)? Do you consider that to be pollution too?

36 posted on 11/21/2008 1:51:41 PM PST by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: palmer
What about O2(a by-product of electrolysis when producing hydrogen for fuel)? Do you consider that to be pollution too?

Pollution emerges when something is left outside a closed ecological cycle. O2 is released at the electrolysis process, but it's consumed in a H2 burning process. So we have a cycle: 2H20 (electrolysis)-->2H2+O2-->2H2O (burning). If we have an alike cycle producing energy for the electrolysis, we have an unchanging (non being polluted environment). If we look at the conventional combustion engine, the same cycle can be maintained if we can convert the CO2 and H20 produced at combustion into oil (or petrol).

37 posted on 11/21/2008 2:08:33 PM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: palmer

Continuation: so the O2 from electrolysis isn’t a polluting agent. CO2 from our caloric engines is a different issue, since it’s not balanced with th O2 generation done by the plants.


38 posted on 11/21/2008 2:12:28 PM PST by Freelance Warrior (A Russian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson