Posted on 11/20/2008 8:28:49 AM PST by Candor7
Chances are that Obama’s dad, whoever he might be, took the referenced nude photos of his mom:
http://dissectleft.blogspot.com/2008/10/naughty-obama-mamma-its-amazing-what.html
http://libertas.bigblog.com.au/data/0/3861/image/luckyagain3706620081022130550.jpg
http://libertas.bigblog.com.au/data/0/3861/image/nudeholidayobama23706720081022130549.jpg
http://libertas.bigblog.com.au/data/0/3861/image/luckyagain24569920081022213401.jpg
You’re welcome, TK!
Warning; don’t click the links at #201 if you are easily offended.
Pinging Ping List newcomers to nude photos of 0bama’s mama, Stanley Ann; they are part of 0bama’s cyber-history and have been discussed previously on other threads.
Could you imagine W’s mom, Barbara Bush’s photos being plastered all over the net......How low does this country go?
Thanks Lucy.
I am now turning in for the night. Its after 12 here in the East and its been a long day.
The Anti-Dem energy is back on FR.
Thanks, LucyT
Ping.
In photo # 1 in the article, notice that the window BEHIND Stanley Ann has the shade only halfway down, so she would have been visible from outside. That is odd! Does anyone see a reflection of the person taking the photo?
In photo #2, there are packages under the tree. Can anyone zoom in to see who the Christmas packages are addressed to??
Thanks for posting the links; I had forgotten about them.
Good night, Candor7.
Those are Obama’s mama? When were they taken? I see a Christmas tree, if it was 1960 it could be about the time he was conceived.
Note Stanley Ann’s shoes.
Shoes?
Shoes: If this were Christmas 1960 she still would have been in Seattle, WA..I don’t suppose one would wear those sandals in Washington in December??
So, would this photo then be Christmas, 1961 in Hawaii?
What do the record albums say that are visible?
Ummmmmmmm, if it’s warm enough for a birthday suit, it’s warm enough for those shoes...
But what is a possible ruling? That he is ineligible? That he must provide evidence? What?
LOL!!
I was trying to fit the shoes in the time and place timeline!!
The shoes in question were the kind of slutty sandals worn by exotic dancers and hookers in that era. They are simply a part of the photo shoot.
Very interestingl
If the shoes did belong to Mrs. Davis #2, what about the fancy ring on Ann’s left hand? Maybe that also belonged to Mrs. Davis #2.
And the shoes..not indigenous to Hawaii,but maybe not unsual for Helen Canfield Chicago socialite and Marshall's second wife. The photos are important in the sense that they explain the going to Chicago and the immediate acceptance by the hard left, if his father is Frank Marshall Davis, not just his mentor.
What does COLB stand for?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
