You admitted that he flip-flopped.
Romney does that a lot.
You admitted that he flip-flopped.
Romney does that a lot.
They were quotes you provided. Romney didn’t post them here, you did.
English isn’t that hard a language, but sometimes people really try hard NOT to communicate, because it makes it easier to obfuscate.
and again, I did not admit that he flip-flopped in my earlier post, nor did I in fact say anything about him flip-flopping in my earlier post.
Your assumption that, because I pointed out a potentially misleading part of your post, that I was agreeing with anything else you said, is absurd.
Your use of the term “admit” is simply another example of how you try to mislead people here.
The appropriate term, if I had said something about the actual information you posted, would have been “agreed”, not “admit”. If someone hasn’t disagreed with something, or said something different, they are not “admitting” something.
“admit” carries the connotation of either a change of position or the correction of a previous statement. Neither would be applicable here.
I only emphasize this to point out to the readership how you are attempting to mislead them.
And for the record, Romney would have been better on “rights”, including the rights of people who were gay, than Kennedy.
That’s because liberals are really bad on actual rights, while conservative principles defend the God-given rights that we all have as individuals.
Under conservatives, a rich gay person will have his right to keep his money and to own private property defended, while under liberals like Kennedy the only “right” they will have will be the right to continue their sinful ways.
But if you don’t define your terms, you can make people believe anything.