I totaly agree about Reagan but the way most are telling it you think he was in combat, anyway my point there are many ways to service this country even if one does not get an temporal commission from the military.
The Lord has his soldiers too.
It is SOME of you folks who are doing the bending and twisting of Mitt and also LDS intent.
but you will not allow yourselves to acknowledged.
It would cramp your agenda.
Being drafted into religious service is not the same as voluntary military service, and equating the two is insulting to military families who know the sacrifice their sons, daughters, husbands and wives are making.
Please do not say it is the same thing.
This thinking is ahort sighted one of our greatest presidents Ronald Reagan had no military record, period
You, like many of your peers, got caught yet again putting forth an untruth, and instead of admitting it and moving on, you try and walk around it and act as if you said something else, and everyone else is just being obtuse refusing to see your brilliant and logically argument.
You have learned well from your teachers.
As far as service, military service is military service, period as you would say.
And there is only one real agenda here, be it me, Jim Robinson or any one else, and that is to support Conservatism and those politicians who represent those ideals, regardless of whether they are religious peers or not. So then I have to ask, given Mitts lack of Conservative credentials, established facts and the position of the majority here in regard to Romney, what exactly is your agenda, and that of your peers?