Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

#1 Is the fault of our government and us(for not demanding one) going back to Nixon.

#2 is flat out our government's fault...and us. They control the money but we sure as hell let them throw it at us.

#3 and #4 are GM's own damn fault. Nobody else.

#5 Not GM's fault that it happened but sure as hell their fault how they were unprepaired for it.

Do we really want the government and the automakers in bed together to solve this with a bailout?

1 posted on 11/18/2008 7:26:38 PM PST by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Delacon

SAVE THE UAW, uh, uh, um, ah, um, I mean, um uh, GM!
- The One!


2 posted on 11/18/2008 7:30:32 PM PST by April Lexington (We are now in the era of Timothy Leary Economics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

GM has 7,000 dealers. toyota has around 1,500. That’s another area of overhead that will be hard to reverse


3 posted on 11/18/2008 7:32:41 PM PST by ari-freedom (So this is how Liberty dies... with thunderous applause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

1. Unions
2. Unions
3. Unions
4. Unions
5. Piss Poor Cars


5 posted on 11/18/2008 7:33:27 PM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

Companies don’t want to take responsibility for their own failures.

Individuals don’t want to take responsibility for their own failures.

What else is new.


6 posted on 11/18/2008 7:37:19 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

“3. Legacy Costs”
...when the Japanese started building plants here they could hire young workers who were healthy...some of them are getting older now....others will be eligible to retire in a decade or so...eventually they’re going to encounter the legacy costs of an aging workforce themselves.


7 posted on 11/18/2008 7:40:13 PM PST by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

The arrogant executives who ran the Big Three were always fighting with the unions, but at the same time they were in bed with them. Like the old steel mills, they thought they could just keep raising prices forever. They were wrong.


8 posted on 11/18/2008 7:41:35 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

GM is hurt by Congress all the time . . .CAFE standards . . Energy Policy on drilling . . self imposed Oil Supply Crisis.
If Congress BAILS OUT GM . . . will Congress Pass laws anymore that negatively Impact the Auto Industry ?
Tis an interesting Confliction for Congressional Greenies and Corporate Ownership of GM by Congress.


13 posted on 11/18/2008 7:50:02 PM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

GM is hurt by Congress all the time . . .CAFE standards . . Energy Policy on drilling . . self imposed Oil Supply Crisis.
If Congress BAILS OUT GM . . . will Congress Pass laws anymore that negatively Impact the Auto Industry ?
Tis an interesting Confliction for Congressional Greenies and Corporate Ownership of GM by Congress.


14 posted on 11/18/2008 7:50:37 PM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

Sounds like a perfect candidate for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy to me.


15 posted on 11/18/2008 7:51:40 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon
6. The myth that ricegrinders are better than American cars. The same media, marketing, disparagement, and myth generation techniques used to brainwash America to buy the Obama crappola has been used for years to promote riceburners.
16 posted on 11/18/2008 7:51:43 PM PST by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon
#1 Is the fault of our government and us(for not demanding one) going back to Nixon.

#1 is an instant replay of the seventies after the first oil shocks. Only it wasn't SUV's it was big gas-guzzling sedans and overpowered muscle cars. Don't blame the government, the Japanese saw this coming. The big three were too arrogant to see that slick marketing and brand loyalty wouldn't save them.

When Americans voted with their pocketbooks Detroit, the einsteins of the car business, were caught flatfooted. They fought back, with garbage. Remember Chrysler's K-Car anyone? How about the Pacer? Gremlin?Yeccch. As bad as the Aztec.

Meanwhile Datsun gave us the 240-Z, ushering in the era of dominance by Japan.

18 posted on 11/18/2008 7:52:51 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

Am I imagining the following, or is it factual. The automakers showcase these fancy concept cars at auto shows. People say “ooh” and “wow” and want them. Then crappy production cars are made, and look nothing like the concept cars. If any make it to production, only a few are made and only the dealers get them and they’re uber-expensive. GM should listen to the people, and actually make cars that the people want.


23 posted on 11/18/2008 8:04:08 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon
5 Reasons Why America's Largest Car Company Teeters on the Edge

And they are...

1 - government
2 - government
3 - government
4 - UAW (with government backing)
5 - government

24 posted on 11/18/2008 8:08:08 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

Reason #1. UAW


30 posted on 11/18/2008 8:26:25 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon; All
CAFE stands for Corporate Average Fuel Economy. The key word is AVERAGE. The American Car companies fought against this because they sold more large (or larger) cars, SUV's, and Trucks than did the Foreign Manufacturers. Therefore it was easier for the Foreign Car Companies to meet the CAFE standards. What the Car Companies were arguring for is to make adjustments for the types of vehicles they sold. I wish some people on this site would do some research before posting

There are a number of idiots posting here tonight mentioning the notion that GM, Ford, and Chrysler should have made more small cars. WRONG! They lost money on small cars because they have legacy costs of about $2000-$2300 per car. It's extremely difficult if not altogether impossible to make a profit on a small car for an American Car Company. If you look at equivalent cars the gas mileage is nearly identical. If you don't believe it then look it up.

Lots of really dumb posters here on the Auto Industry. More of these posters should do some research before posting so that they will know what they are talking about.
37 posted on 11/18/2008 9:04:56 PM PST by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Delacon

I am against any bailout unless the UAW and its members take about a 40% haircut on Wages and fringes. The same applies to the AutoMakers.

Why should AMERICANS pay for the corrupt unions bailout if they won’t take a haircut too. Enough is enough.


47 posted on 11/19/2008 10:37:22 AM PST by ncfool (ObaBama stands for The New United Socialist State or "TNUSSA")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson