Replies

You should stop being so ignorant and read the following... Details on case in Hawaii that goes trial tomorrow.

Why would I want to read some whacko's blog? Isn't that how this whole thing started? In the blogosphere? If I remember rightly, World Nut Daily was one of the first to pick this thing up and run with it. That tells me plenty.

No, I'm not a leftist. Just somebody whose been around FR way too long. I've see it all. Clinton's illegitimate lovechild, Vince Foster, Y2K, etc etc. I've seen hundreds of FR conspiracy theories. They're usually baloney.

There's some nice, down-to-earth, rational people on this site but there's also a sizable portion of paranoid conspiracy nuts.

Because it explains the details of his CASE, moron.

Try refuting the facts that he is going to present to the court tomorrow vs spouting your ignorance on this forum.

The blogosphere does a better job hunting down facts on things then the media. Take the Global Warming fiasco that the blogosphere just proved that the GISS falsified its OCTOBER data by using August temperatures from Russia in order to claim October was the hottest October ever. When it was actually one of the coolest ones on record.

Take the blogosphere that was the first to prove Dan Rather’s lies.

Consider the 20 lawsuits that are currently going on and try to find out why these are not being summarily dismissed. That is because there is a lot of legs to this story.

Let's consider those 'wacko conspiracy theories' that upset you, eh?

Clinton's illegitmate lovechild -- While a specific legit case is not known, why would there not be at least a few? To think that there are none, given just the *public record under oath* of his affairs, is unreasonable, unless the man is sterile. To say that there are none is almost the same as saying that Chelsea is not his child. It's possible that Chelsea is his one and only child, but that is less probable, imo.
Vince Foster -- Ruled a suicide, and left a strange note. In an administration notorious for its lies and cover-ups. A case that begs questions.
Y2K -- The catastrophe that never was. But there WAS plenty of bad computer code that got examined and fixed. Myself, I worked one problem -- an actual shutdown of the Oceanic Air Traffic Control system that happened exactly at midnight 1/1/2001. No bug found, and problem never re-occurred.

The life philosophy of "Semper Paratus" means that sometimes we do get roped into dithers about some false alarm of a situation. But the three cases you just mentioned were not false alarms. Sometimes, many times I think, things just get left hanging, unresolved. Life moves on. That doesn't mean you learn to turn your guard down -- instead you just learn, sock away the lesson someplace and hope to improve your predictive abilities. But don't fall into submission in front of the cheaters, thieves, liars, and thugs. Bear with the occasioned false and hanging alerts.

You mean like those conspiracy nuts that eventually forced Obama to admit to (British crown) Kenyan citizenship at birth?

The nuts who dug up the Reverend Wright tapes?

The nuts who exposed Obama’s lie about his uncle freeing prisoners at Auschwitz.

The ones who exposed Obama’s fictitious account of him being a product of the Selma march?

The ones that dug up his school records in Indonesia exposing his lie that “I have never been a muslim”

The nuts who exposed the doctored photos from AP and Reuters during the Israeli/Hezbollah war?

Yes, nothing but a bunch of nuts out here picking on poor Obama.