Uh.....yes it is. Legally it's proof.
The Dept. of Hawaiian Home Lands mentions both documents as follows:
“DHHL utilizes information that is found only on the original Certificate of Live Birth, which is either black or green. This is a more complete record of your birth than the Certification of Live Birth (a computer-generated printout). Submitting the original Certificate of Live Birth will save you time and money since the computer-generated Certification requires additional verification by DHHL.”
Imagine that: The Department of Hawaiian Homelands requires additional verification for a COLB, but no agency or branch of the US Government has authority or responsibility to verify the computer-generated certification of birth of a candidate for the highest office in the land.
P.S. The reason the DHHL requires “further certification” is that birth certificates can be amended, sealed and re-issued under many circumstances, and the COLB does not always represent the facts on the original certificate.
The abstract which is a forgery does not say where he was born as does the original COLB which specifies FOREIGN COUNTRY. This is not proof. Get the facts correct. The only thing that proves he was born in this country would be the ORIGINAL COLB which has been SEALED by Hawaii’s governor after Obamas visit.