Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Democrat" 401K Confiscation Proposal is "Republican" Mandatory Savings Plan
John Birch Society ^ | 11/15/2008 | Eagle USA

Posted on 11/15/2008 2:47:36 PM PST by EagleUSA

Monday, 10 November 2008 06:32

"Democrats in the U.S. House have been conducting hearings on proposals to confiscate workers’ personal retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — and convert them to accounts managed by the Social Security Administration."

That was the lead sentence in an article entitled, "Dems Target Private Retirement Accounts," published in the Carolina Journal on November 4th. With those alarming openers, the article has gone viral over the last week — at least among those who advocate less government interference in their economic lives.

Unfortunately, the Carolina Journal is only telling half of the story — the baaaad Democrat half. Missing from the Carolina Journal is the baaaad Republican half that suggests replacing voluntary 401K contributions and savings with mandatory retirement savings accounts. This oversight is in keeping with the target market for the Carolina Journal — establishment Republicans who like their partisanship dressed-up in libertarian platitudes. The Carolina Journal is the flagship publication of the North Carolina-based John Locke Foundation (JLF). JLF employs respected (small government is better) scholars, but also raises money by bringing to town neo-conservative (bigger government is better for spreading democracy) luminaries like William Kristol and Frank Gaffney.

(Excerpt) Read more at jbs.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; 401k; agenda; bho2008; confiscate; gop; jbs; retirement; savings; socialists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: Tench_Coxe

Nothing new here. The Republicans, for years, have been advocating individual retirement accounts. Were they listened to, there would have been built-in safety mechanisms that would have saved those who most recently have retired, from disaster.


21 posted on 11/15/2008 4:07:17 PM PST by yorkie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
How much credibility would you assign it, and why?

Not much.

From Robert Welch forward, it's been pretty much the voice of hysteria. Dwight D. Eisenhower was not a Communist, for example.

What's your take?

22 posted on 11/15/2008 4:09:10 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
Well, they aren't as phony a source as say, The New York Times or The Chicago Tribune.

That would be true. But doesn't that amount to faint praise...???

23 posted on 11/15/2008 4:11:20 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

You’re quoting the John Birch Society?
::::::::::
What is of importance here is not the source, but the THREAT. Most people caught that.


24 posted on 11/15/2008 4:22:25 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keflavik76
I think this was a case of "If you want half a loaf you ask for the whole loaf. If you want the whole loaf, ask for a buffet with some nice cold cuts." The 'Rats want to get rid of tax deferred contributions to 401ks, so they ask to take them over entirely and "settle" on no new accounts and no tax deferral on new contributions. We shouldn't be tricked into giving up some 401k features in relief that they aren't taking them all.
25 posted on 11/15/2008 4:24:24 PM PST by KarlInOhio (11/4: The revolutionary socialists beat the Fabian ones. Where can we find a capitalist party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dbacks
Except the Republican plan paid at the actual rate of gains. The dems plan to pay out a fantastic 3% less government fees and TAXES which will be 5-8%. IOW, NET LOSS!
::::::::::
They do not plan to do you any significant favors. This is about the acquisition of your wealth for their political use, not about your retirement protection, or whatever other sceme BS reason they come up with to "justify" taking your money.
26 posted on 11/15/2008 4:27:59 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

I just cashed out my IRA. If Washington is going to confiscate these things it will happen suddenly without any formal warning . Just one morning you will check on your fund and find out that Uncle Sam has sequestered it, like when FDR confiscated gold.


27 posted on 11/15/2008 4:29:01 PM PST by arthurus (Old Age beat itself with its own guile and lack of enthusiasm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbacks

Plus the donk plan is only 50% inheritable, while the individual owned all of his own account under the GOP plan.


28 posted on 11/15/2008 4:47:14 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

If Washington is going to confiscate these things it will happen suddenly without any formal warning .
::::::::::
Exactly. Totally covert. It is expected.


29 posted on 11/15/2008 4:47:52 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Bump


30 posted on 11/15/2008 4:57:13 PM PST by dcwusmc (We need to make government so small that it can be drowned in a bathtub.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Just wait until Zero and co go after ALL pensions and roll those into SS.


31 posted on 11/15/2008 5:08:23 PM PST by DownInFlames (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: okie01

And how much credibility should we assign the Carolina Journal? I don’t know what to believe, but whatever decision I make is going to have a huge impact on my family. There may be a very small window to protect yourself if you need to, and it may be totally bogus. Who among the press ever tells the truth?

Wish I had some answers.


32 posted on 11/15/2008 5:09:40 PM PST by daylilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: daylilly
And how much credibility should we assign the Carolina Journal?

I have no idea. But we do know that their report is corroborated by other, highly credible sources: The Democrat majority in Congress IS examining ways to confiscate 401-K accounts and merge them with the bankrupt Social Security system.

33 posted on 11/15/2008 5:35:24 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: daylilly

Rush has been talking about this for several weeks.


34 posted on 11/15/2008 5:36:59 PM PST by sibb1213
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DownInFlames

Just wait until Zero and co go after ALL pensions and roll those into SS.
::::::::::
I am sure they are kicking that around too -— I wonder how that will sit with their union buddies???


35 posted on 11/15/2008 5:53:38 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Would you consider Obama a communist? The JBS never accused Ike of being a member of the Communist Party. But a discerning review of American history shows that he was never any thorn in the Soviet’s side. The Rockefellerites engineered the defeat of Bob Taft in 1952 and this country has never recovered from that betrayal of the Republic. YMMV.


36 posted on 11/15/2008 6:18:49 PM PST by Misterioso ( "Socialism is an ideology. Capitalism is a natural phenomenon." -- M. Rothschild.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01
One more thing. From Robert Welch forward? That shows your basic ignorance of the subject.
37 posted on 11/15/2008 6:20:48 PM PST by Misterioso ( "Socialism is an ideology. Capitalism is a natural phenomenon." -- M. Rothschild.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Misterioso
That shows your basic ignorance of the subject.

So Robert Welch had nothing to do with the JBS?

If that's the case, then I plead guilty.

38 posted on 11/15/2008 6:25:46 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: okie01
There is no JBS before Robert Welch since he was the founder. You said from Welch forward, implying its prior existence. Is it your opinion that JBS articles are not respectable enough for FR?
39 posted on 11/15/2008 6:51:09 PM PST by Misterioso ( "Socialism is an ideology. Capitalism is a natural phenomenon.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

bttt


40 posted on 11/15/2008 7:07:54 PM PST by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson