Sigh. I am not saying you called me a name. I am saying that by using terms like “tinfoil” which you did use, IIRC, jumping the shark, and conspiracy, you are denigrating all the people here and elsehwere who have dug stuff up about the BC and eligibility for president situation. You have not made any attempt to read more than a little, by your own admission. You are, IMO, attempting to paint this entire situation with the “conspiracy” paintbrush, for reason or reasons of your own.
Your statment about Republicans not being moderate enough is enough to explain things.
And your use of the word “conspiracy” is an attempt to taint. Obama and very few others could know any damaging info about his BC, it wouldn’t have to be a large number of people. Many people? Some in Kenya who aren’t allowed to be interviewed, and practically everyone else, in the US, who would know is dead.
I don’t think it is healthy for our democracy to constantly have these unresolved currents of intrigue swirling around our political milieu.
And now we are told to expect the “most transparent transition” in history.
In the interest of transparency, could we please see all relevant documents? Or is what should be our right to know over-ruled by a mesmerized mob?
Please show me where I used the term tinfoil. If you are going to accuse me, please provide proof.
You accused me of personal attacks—I quote you: “and using words that attack the people rather than their arguments”. When did I attack a person. Please provide a quote.
How in the world does this not qualify as a conspiracy?! From the dictionary: “a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose”
When did I claim Republicans are not moderate enough? Please quote. I pointed out that we need moderates to provide the numbers to overthrow Obama in 4 years.