Hawwii dept health officials have never, at any time, made a statement to the effect that they have verified Obama’s actual place of birth, citizenship history/status, or other ammendments that have occurred to the document. They have only stated that whatever he has filed with the state of Hawawii is authentic, and, that by law, they are not allowed to comment on any personal data that is included in his long form birth certificate.
The state of Hawaii dept of health comments have only raised more questions about what Obama is possibly trying to conceal.
There can always be more questions but that doesn’t mean that there will be any more answers.
From your link:
“The state’s Department of Health director on Friday released a statement verifying the legitimacy of Sen. Barack Obama birth certificate.”
A BC registered in Hawaii for an individual born outside of the US, or for an individual whose BC reflects past/current dual citizenship.....is authentic.
That has absolutely nothing to do with whether the person is constitutionally elligible to serve as POTUS.
Furthermore:
“Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence,” the document said. “The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama’s original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him.”
Sorry, but Barry’s COLB, fake or otherwise simply does not qualify as verification of natural born citizenship, or status of any dual citizenship. Only his long form would have this necessary detail.
Past candidates were disqualified for this same exact concern:
“Historically, California Secretaries of State have exercised their due diligence by reviewing necessary background documents, verifying that the candidates that were submitted by the respective political parties as eligible for the ballot were indeed eligible. In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for President of the United States. The then SOS, Mr. Frank Jordan, found that, according to Mr. Cleaver’s birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for President. Using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States.”
Similarly, in 1984, the Peace and Freedom Party candidate Larry Holmes was removed from the ballot.
The “certificate of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign cannot be viewed as authoritative, the case alleges.