Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freepersup

My take is that any definitive conclusions on the case are still in abeyance. It is unfortunate that two irrelevancies are included in the application which would have a better chance without this scattershot approach.

What were the dates of the Courts rulings in 2000? IOW how fast did it act?


2,452 posted on 11/20/2008 10:01:17 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2442 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob
Donofrio admits to rushing his case once the NJ Courts finished with him, due to the proximity to the election. He also admits to hoping, wanting and needing to add to his filing, should he be permitted to do so. What do you know about the review process regarding additional submissions?

What were the dates of the Courts rulings in 2000? IOW how fast did it act?

I don't recall... (*thinking* several weeks) I will roll up my sleeves and edify myself. I suspect you know. ;o)

What with the Electors' duties fast approaching, might the Court put the process on the 'fast track' (should a review be granted out of conference) and seeing to it's national importance?

OK Barrister, I have the dates from the Bush-Gore 2000, USSC rulings (3). Dec. 1st, Dec. 4th and Dec. 12th. Looks like the decision came down before the 2000 Electors cast their votes. I'd say that time is of the essence once again for this Court in this situation.

2,457 posted on 11/21/2008 4:20:50 AM PST by freepersup (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2452 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson