To strike this portion of the constitution down would either require an amendment or 5 justices who think the constitution is nothing more than toilet paper.
Will Clarence Thomas have the guts to do the right thing and allow the case to be heard? I think yes, as Obama has made it crystal clear in interviews that he thinks Thomas is an ignorant dolt.
Wasn’t that strange, 0 selecting Thomas as the one Justice he’d have voted against? Citing intellectual deficiency?
I’ve already forgotten which media figure axed him which Justice he’d have shot down.
Washington was British subject loyal to the crown until 1776. He then became Loyal to the United States.
Obama is very similar, loyal to the British via a British Colony, Kenya, until he turned 21, by his own admissions. We can only truly be loyal to one nation. We can only have but one master.
If obama is inaugurated, we will then have a president who has divided his national loyalties between four different countries since birth. Great Britain, Kenya, Indonesia, and the USA. This is Exactly what the intent of the constitution was designed to prevent.
Unfortunately we need a constitutional amendment that allows such a change in intent.
Expecting our justices to Honor the Constitutions explicit intent ..... to do their job.... is the only doubt on the table now as far as I am concerned.
“””Will Clarence Thomas have the guts to do the right thing and allow the case to be heard?””
Obama launched a personal attack on Thomas & I doubt Thomas has a short memory for condescending pukes...
When asked to name a Supreme Court justice he would not have appointed, Obama named Clarence Thomas.
“I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation, setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the Constitution,” Obama said.
The idiot forgot that...Thomas already had been confirmed by the Senate to three different positions – including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (the second-most prestigious court in the land after the U.S. Supreme Court) – before he was nominated to the Supreme Court.
He’s the only justice on the Supreme Court who, prior to his appointment, had recognized the relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution – that the Constitution is a means of indicating the inalienable rights that are traceable to our Creator.
Obama also named Justices Scalia – “He and I just disagree, you know?”— and Chief Justice Roberts – as two justices he probably wouldn’t have appointed.
McCain named the four most liberal members of the court as judges he would not have appointed – Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and Souter.
I also think someone needs to brace Harvard fot allowing Obama in under Affirmative Action. Since the requirement is for a person to be 45% black, Obama doesn’t qualify, with only 6.5%...43.5% is Arab.
Two things I can’t stand are liars and thieves, and he’s both.