Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KevinB

In Ohio there’s no registration of party. Whichever ballot you choose is your identified party. I agree about crossover voting. My point, though, is that some states aren’t set up that way.

If the party assigns delegates by county, and candidates only get the counties they win, then that would lessen the impact of crossover voting in any state. It would also mean that a candidate has to appeal to all conservative voters across the country before they lock the nomination down.

A third change I’d like is that the new conservative caucus agree on no more than 2 names to promote for the campaign with the less successful candidate pledged to drop out and assign delegates to the more successful conservative candidate at some point in the nominating process.


17 posted on 11/11/2008 3:51:04 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain Pro Deo et Patria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Crossover voting is going to be DISASTEROUS in 2012 because Obama will be running, so ALL the Democrats will Crossover and vote for the WEAKEST REPUBLICAN!! THIS MUST STOP!!


23 posted on 11/11/2008 3:57:31 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
In Ohio there’s no registration of party. Whichever ballot you choose is your identified party.

Nor is there in Texas.

70 posted on 11/11/2008 6:10:55 AM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson