Article's conclusion: If our politicians can't avoid throwing taxpayer cash at Detroit, then they should at least do so in a way that really protects taxpayers. That means handing a receiver the power to replace current management, zero out current shareholders, and especially to rewrite labor and other contracts. Anything less is merely a payoff to Michigan politicians and their union allies.
1 posted on
11/10/2008 5:35:02 AM PST by
Zakeet
To: Zakeet
Reminds me of Reagan’s old line about the government’s philosophy: “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops moving, subsidize it.” Sounds very applicable here.
To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.
Bailout thread for 11-10-08
3 posted on
11/10/2008 6:00:20 AM PST by
grellis
(I am Jill's overwhelming sense of disgust.)
To: Zakeet
The union thugs have their hands out in return for their votes. The “big” 3 are going to get their bailout.
To: Zakeet
bad management and unions caused the problema.
let all 3 go down, and drive hondas, toyotas, etc.
new auto co’s would rise to the occasion,
w/o unions.
unions suck. they get more wages for less work, and we’re stuck with their communist politicians.
7 posted on
11/10/2008 6:28:16 AM PST by
ken21
(people die and you never hear from them again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson