Posted on 11/09/2008 1:07:31 AM PST by Paul R.
bttt
Not supporting Palin is just another piece of the McCain legacy.
As he should.
If he's allowing/ordering his underlings to "take out" Palin in a way that doesn't come back on him, then he's scum. If he knows the charges aren't true, and allows them to continue, then he's scum.
If he supported McCain Feingold; he's scum.
If he supported amnesty; he's scum.
If he voted for the bailout; he's scum.
If he deliberately threw the election; he's scum.
At least we won't have to hear "my friends" or "reaching across the aisle" anymore.
for those of you who haven’t seen this, it’s absolutely EXCELLENT..
Mark.
Demrats have talked openly, if anonymously, about punishing McCain for have the audacity to contest the presidential election. Ergo, Mr. Bipartisan, will probably not do the honorable thing. His response to this BS should have been immediate and vigorous.
I emailed his Senate office and told him I’m ashamed of the person he has become. Furthermore, I want my campaign contribution money back. The Senator did not run a credible campaign, therefore he cheated me and everyone who sent him money.
“I approved the call and was in abject horror of what I had done,” he recounted. “But she said, ‘Look, it’s not about whose fault this is, don’t beat yourself up, let’s just move on.’
These knucklehead French Canadian DJs pulled it off with the Queen as well so Palin wasn't the first duped.
What I want to know is the names of the “sources.” Reporting garbage without naming sources is yellow journalism. Carl Cameron is now on my leper-list.
I’ll let my grandchildren know as we will have left our human lives at that point.
My husband got an email from McCain’s campaign...basically saying “Kumbaya”...we should support Hussein now. He was furious. We did not give the maximum allowed to have the top of our ticket give a mealy mouthed email saying (basically) that there is little difference between the two parties. He deserved to lose. He is more interested in refurbishing his senate creds than taking on the position of “loyal opposition” ...where we stand up for those points that are essential to this country and fight for those principles. INstead, he will spend most of his time being the republican version of the democratic party.
Carly Fiorina ?
When one thinks of the brave Americans in our past, Nathan Hale, the men at the Alamo, the General who said "Nuts" to the Germans when surrounded, men of courage and SPINE we see McCain's character in a complete meltdown as he couldn't even muster one drop of loyalty for a woman.
This wouldn't have taken that much bravery, John. I will always look at you as John the Betrayer. You aren't fit to shine Sarah's mukluks.
Leni
But that is McCain's MO and why I think he rode Sarah's skirt-tails.
“I personally think that the bad mouthing of Sarah Palin is being done by undercover demo-rats.”
Does that include McCain himself?
Well for all we know they did ask the right questions. I have read on earlier threads and heard accusations during the campaign about the 'Bush' aides being responsible for the gossip and holding her back. Sure does not sound that way with the ones who would allow their names to be used in this piece.
Please proofread your statements so that they can be clearly understood when posted.
My apologies on the typos. If you are referring to the content of my post—please practice your reading comprehension for further posts!
I’d like to see Palin cold cock Cameron, like Bruce Willis’ wife did the reporter at the end of the first “Die Hard” movie.
I couldn't manage to get through that and was interested in what you were attempting to say.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.