To: Terpfen
There's 0% proof that Romney is behind the attacks. You are providing supporting evidence that Romney is a liberal, not that he is behind the attacks on Palin. Again: you are more interested in wanting to be right than actually being right.There is 0% proof that ANYONE is behind the attacks. It is all anonymous and cowardly.
Again, you want to defend RINOs who have something to gain from these attacks and offer nothing in return other than disparaging comments against a fellow Freeper.
Rather than being snotty against your fellows, try to keep in mind that we all offer OPINIONS on the issues. That does not make your opinion any better than mine.
35 posted on
11/09/2008 7:06:40 AM PST by
Erik Latranyi
(Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
To: Erik Latranyi
Again, you want to defend RINOs who have something to gain from these attacks and offer nothing in return other than disparaging comments against a fellow Freeper.
I'm not defending Romney. I'm saying you're wrong to claim Romney is behind the attacks simply by saying Romney is a liberal.
Come up with proof.
36 posted on
11/09/2008 7:10:45 AM PST by
Terpfen
(Ain't over yet, folks. Those 2004 Senate gains are up for grabs in 2 years.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson