[TheCipher]

That is the press release he has up there. Not the actual Writ of Certiorari filed. He makes no mention of judicial error in the press release. He says that he believes Surrick is wrong in claiming that he doesn't have standing. That is not judicial error. That is claiming he ruled wrong ( which I agree he did). To show you what I meant by judicial error, here is a repost of an open letter to Judge Surrick that I posted both on Freepers and obamacrimes the day of the ruling.

To The DISHONORABLE R. Barclay Surrick:

At the end of your ruling you state: By contrast, Plaintiff would have us derail the democratic process by invalidating a candidate for whom millions of people voted and who underwent excessive vetting during what was one of the most hotIy contested presidential primary in living memory.

I don’t recall any evidence presented to the court about excessive vetting of Obama. As a matter of fact, that was part of the suit against the DNC - produce any materials as a result of any vetting they did. Did the DNC produce anything to you without showing it to the opposing side ? If they did and you didn’t inform the other side, isn’t that judicial error ( to put it kindly ) ? If they didn’t produce anything , please tell me your justification for the statement who underwent excessive vetting

[Lmo56]

“That is the press release he has up there. Not the actual Writ of Certiorari filed.”

This is VERY strange ...

I can’t find the Writ on his site anymore. But I previously downloaded it. It is 40 pages long.

If you send me your e-mail address on FR Mail, I will send to you via regular e-mail.