Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exit82
That's a point I keep forgetting. It seems he wasn't looking to the future of the party

Are you serious?

You think a Bush VP who would had to be loyal for 8 or 4 years would stand a chance considering Bush's abysmal performance rating
158 posted on 11/07/2008 2:51:29 PM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: uncbob

Yes, I am serious.

Bush won in 2004 by over 3 million votes. No thanks to Cheney. Had Bush won with someone new, that person could have been groomed for succession, instead of going with the “old guy”, McCain, the RINO, a repeat of the disastrous campaign with Bob Dole in 1996.

And yes, this was the President who famously claimed after his re-election he was going to use his political capital—remember? What did he do with it? Remember—”see you at the signing”?

Now ask yourself this question: Who now is the leader of the Republican Party? There is none.

Mission Accomplished, while a radical Marxist prepares to move into the White House.


161 posted on 11/07/2008 3:00:40 PM PST by exit82 (It's all Obama's fault. And Biden is still a moron. They are both above their paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson